About Us › Forums › Future of OSS in South Africa › Policy & 4IR
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 4 years, 11 months ago by Aslam Raffee.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
9th November 2019 at 12:16 pm #2214Aslam RaffeeParticipant
Abuja Declaration
The meetings analyzed:
1. Different definitions of technology.
2. How the fourth industrial revolution affects conservation and biodiversity.
3. The implications of emerging technologies on agriculture and food, including extreme biotechnology and precision agriculture.
4. The implications of emerging technologies on environment and climate: geo-engineering and extractive technologies.
5. Gene drives, an extreme biotechnology targeted at Africa, with Burkina Faso as the entry point.
6. Biosafety policy and legislative frameworks on the continent, especially with reference to Nigeria.
7. The importance and functions of technology assessment platforms, with examples from Asia and Latin America.
The participants noted:
1. That contrary to claims by industry players and their government supporters, technology is not neutral, but rather political and sometimes with conceited objectives.
2. Africa has become a dumping ground for new technologies without prior assessments being conducted by governments and civil society groups, and local communities.
3. Technologies, such as GMOs, synthetic biology, and geo-engineering, have cultural, sanitary, environmental, economic and social impacts in Africa. They can bring about the disruption of livelihoods on a massive scale.
4. Africa is rich in endogenous technologies that can be harnessed to address its socio-economic and ecological challenges. We must not succumb to the warped colonial narrative which insists that Africa is lagging behind the rest of the world in terms of development.
5. While mitigation and adaptation are important, what is most relevant is to address the root causes of climate change such as extractivism and over-consumption imposed by neoliberal capitalism and profiteering. Technologies like gene drives and geoengineering technologies are false solutions to complex problems and merely technofixes.
6. Agroecology is a viable alternative to agricultural biotechnology/industrial agriculture and works with nature instead of against it, ensures quality and quantity food production while contributing significantly to the reduction of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
At the end of the discussions, the participants declared:
1. An urgent need for the establishment of an African Technology Assessment Platform (AfriTAP) which brings together civil society groups working together to track, understand and assess the implications of emerging technologies.
2. African governments must urgently diversify national economies away from dependence on fossil fuels and transit to renewable energy for all, owned and controlled by people
3. That seeking public free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) of indigenous people and local communities must be a precondition for the introduction of any new technologies in their territories. These communities must also retain their right to say NO.
4. A moratorium on the approval or deployment of any variant of genetically modified organism and urgent nation-wide consultations on these and other emerging technologies.
5. That governments should shift their focus from industrial agriculture as a solution to the world food and climate crisis, to agroecology; invest in research on agroecology
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.